Stone fireplace and fountain surrounded by colorful flowers in a landscaped garden.

Whole-Property Landscape Design

Where this approach falls short

The page most companies in our position do not write.

Talk about your property (805) 208-3739

Hiring one company to design and build an entire property removes the seams, the coordination burden and the argument about whose fault something is. It is not free of downsides, and several of them are real. Anybody choosing this way of working should choose it knowing what it costs as well as what it buys.

You are concentrating your risk in one company

With four contractors, one failing badly is a bad phase. With one company running everything, one failing badly is the whole project. That is a genuine argument against this model and it does not go away because we are the company saying it.

The mitigation is the ordinary one: check the license, look at work that is several years old rather than several weeks old, and talk to somebody whose project went wrong rather than only to the happy references.

A specialist can beat a generalist at the specialist thing

A company that builds nothing but pools, all year, will know things about pools that a landscape company does not. The same is true of a stonemason who does nothing but stone. What one company buys is coordination, not superiority at every individual trade, and claiming otherwise would be marketing rather than truth.

The headline number is often higher

The headline number is often higher, because a single properly scoped price includes the grading, the drainage, the spoil, the access protection and the make-good that separate quotes push onto somebody else. It reads as more expensive, because it is more complete. Whether it ends up costing more is a different question and the honest answer is: usually not, and not always.

It suits some projects and not others

Replacing a lawn, fixing an irrigation zone or repairing one wall does not need a whole-property approach and should not be sold one. A great deal of our own work is a single element on an otherwise finished property, and that is a perfectly good way to hire us.

What the whole-property approach does do

The whole-property approach gives one owner of the grade, the levels, the services and the sequence. One company accountable for how the parts meet. No seam at which the order of the work can break. Those are worth having, and they are not the same as being better at everything.

Questions people actually ask

So when should we not hire one company for everything?

You should not hire one company for everything when the work is a single element on an otherwise finished property, when you already have a general contractor coordinating trades well, or when a specialist requirement genuinely dominates the project. In those cases the coordination is not the problem being solved.

Why publish this?

Because the alternative is a client who chose this way of working without understanding the trade-off, and finds out at the point when it matters. We would rather be the company that said it and got the smaller job.

Does this mean you take small projects?

Yes. A failing retaining wall, a pool renovation, a badly zoned irrigation system: a great deal of the work is one part of a property.

Tell us about the property

Send a few lines about what you have and what you want. We will tell you what we think it takes, what order it should happen in, and whether we are the right company for it.

Start a design (805) 208-3739